House Republicans Set Noon Deadline for Clinton Testimony Deal
Speaker Mike Johnson gave Bill and Hillary Clinton until noon Tuesday to finalize details on complying with House subpoenas, threatening contempt votes as early as Wednesday if negotiations fail.
The GOP-led House Oversight Committee is demanding the Clintons agree to standard deposition terms—transcribed, filmed sessions in February with no time limits—for its investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. After months of resistance, the Clintons surprised Capitol Hill by reversing course, though their legal team has yet to provide final agreement on the terms.
Republicans view the contempt threat as crucial leverage. "The contempt resolution needs to hang there and be available until we're done," said Rep. Scott Perry, who initially requested the subpoenas. House Oversight Chair James Comer remains interested in obtaining the testimony despite the delays.
Meanwhile, House Republicans secured a key procedural victory to end the four-day partial government shutdown. The $1.2 trillion spending package cleared a 217-215 test vote Tuesday morning after intense White House and leadership lobbying prevented conservative defections. Final passage is expected Tuesday afternoon.
The package funds major agencies through September 30 but provides only short-term Homeland Security funding through February 13, allowing time to negotiate immigration enforcement reforms following incidents where federal officers killed U.S. citizens.
House Democrats, sidelined in Senate-White House negotiations, expressed frustration at being "jammed" with another spending deal they oppose—the third time in under a year.
Video
Background: Why the Clintons Were Subpoenaed
The House Oversight Committee's investigation stems from questions surrounding presidential pardons and commutations granted during Bill Clinton's final days in office, as well as activities of the Clinton Foundation. Republicans have long sought depositions from both Bill and Hillary Clinton regarding financial transactions and communications that they argue were never adequately examined during previous inquiries.
The Negotiation Standoff
Attorney David Kendall, representing the Clintons, has argued that his clients are willing to cooperate but object to the "open-ended" nature of the deposition terms. Specifically, the Clinton legal team has pushed for time limits on questioning, advance notice of topics, and the right to have counsel present throughout — conditions the committee views as obstructing the investigation.
Speaker Johnson's noon deadline represents a significant escalation. Previous attempts to negotiate these terms stretched across several weeks, with both sides accusing the other of acting in bad faith. The contempt threat puts real legal consequences on the table, though constitutional scholars note that enforcement of congressional contempt has historically been inconsistent.
Political Stakes
For House Republicans, this investigation serves multiple purposes: demonstrating oversight authority, energizing their base, and potentially uncovering new information about Clinton-era decisions. For Democrats, the subpoenas represent political theater that distracts from current policy debates. The outcome could set important precedents for future congressional subpoena power, particularly regarding former presidents' obligations to testify before congressional committees.
What Contempt Would Mean
If the House votes to hold the Clintons in contempt, the matter would be referred to the Department of Justice for potential prosecution. However, DOJ referrals from Congress have a mixed track record, with attorneys general from both parties sometimes declining to pursue cases they view as fundamentally political disputes between branches of government.